Rule #1: Blogs are Stupid
Making a Blog is one of the worst things a person can do. I realize this, and so I am going to lay down some ground rules:
1. I promise that this Blog will contain nothing about my "Everyday" goings-ons.
2. The word 'potato' will never occur more than twice per Blog entry.
3. Under no circumstances will I universally adhere to any of these three rules.
Thank you for your attention.
1. I promise that this Blog will contain nothing about my "Everyday" goings-ons.
2. The word 'potato' will never occur more than twice per Blog entry.
3. Under no circumstances will I universally adhere to any of these three rules.
Thank you for your attention.
posted by Unknown at 10:12 PM
4 Comments:
mr. saraceno-
There are three major camps on this controversy. The entire argument boils down to semantic interpretation of the word 'entry'. The Strict-Interpreterists have always believed that the term 'entry' refers to the title as well as the body of the blog post. The Whig-Parliamentariests, on the other hand, believe that the blog 'entry' and 'entry title' are two separate (but equal) manifestations, and should be treated as such in the application of the Second Law. And the Rosemary-Dinglebats believe that "All strawberry yamcicles should be hereafter banished to the Island of Pants."
Take your pick, but I find all three of the philosophical positions to be woefully ignorant of the "Potato Recurrence Act" Recurrence Act of 1859, which states, clearfully, "Inandasmuch that willful deceit within the ad hoc execution of a prima facie quorum on the simple-complex majority sine qua non reductio ad absurdum shall fall within the jurisdiction of the Potato Confederacy on whenceafter this Night of August 5, 1859, Oriental Year of the Banana or Monkey depending on which of the three Chinaman-to-Regular Translation Diciontaries found in the Office Rotund stairwell you use, on the ipso fato habeas corpus specified by Article Crableg (infra) with de jure authority, etcetera etcetera, with or without the approval of the interim Secretary Marshall ne plus ultra." But probably because it doesn't exist.
And as for Stanley Manley-- I believe you meant "Manley Stanley," and yes, I have heard of him. His "dissertashun on american law" can be found here: http://www.geocities.com/lawbooks2003/
Leah-
The most pickles eaten in one sitting was 528 by Kamasuto Maruwashi in 1925. Each pickle's length was no less than three fourths of a picklot, the standard unit of pickle length based on the mythological creature Kobiwa Su, who accidentally casted a spell on the Earth, turning it into a pickle, and then, to reverse the situation, casted a spell on a nearby pickle and turned it into the Earth. And to make up for the fact that the giant pickle was so much larger than this new Earth, Kobiwa Su had to perfrom another magic spell to make the new Earth so much larger as to make the giant pickle seem to just be the size of a regular pickle. This new enormous Earth is the one we live on today, but all things being relative, we don't notice the size.
"There are three major camps on this controversy. The entire argument boils down to..."
that's so funny that you said "boil" because that's what you can do to potatoes!
hi, leah! (oops, can you do that on a blog?)(say hi to someone else, i mean.)
Post a Comment
<< Home